Print Page   |   Report Abuse   |   Sign In   |   Join UPhA
News & Press: Other News

$95M Caremark Verdict Should Put PBMs On Notice

Thursday, July 17, 2025   (0 Comments)

Law360 (July 17, 2025, 5:43 PM EDT) -- 

Bradley Wasser
Elizabeth Kunkel

While the summer lends itself to often-needed vacations, the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania has been hard at work. On June 25, Chief U.S. District Judge Mitchell Goldberg handed down a $95 million judgment against CVS Caremark Corp., CVS Health Corp.'s pharmacy benefits manager, for overbilling the government for Medicare Part D sponsored drugs.[1] The court's bench trial order culminated a decade of ongoing litigation.

In 2014, relator Sarah Behnke filed a qui tam action, U.S. ex rel. Sarah Behnke v. CVS Caremark Corp., alleging that Caremark, a pharmacy benefits manager, or PBM, violated the False Claims Act by causing Medicare Part D plan sponsors — health insurers that offer Medicare Part D coverage — with which it contracted to misrepresent to the government the amount they paid for prescription drugs on behalf of Medicare beneficiaries.

In other words, Caremark — through its contracted Medicare Part D plan sponsors — reported higher costs of drugs to the government than what it actually paid its contracted pharmacies as reimbursement for the Medicare Part D drugs they dispensed.

According to Judge Goldberg's 105-page opinion, the relator was the head Medicare Part D actuary for Aetna Life Insurance Co., which contracted with Caremark to become the insurer's PBM at the time she brought this lawsuit.

READ MORE



Community Search
Sign In
Login with LinkedIn
OR


Latest News
Calendar

11/8/2025
UPhA 2025 Mid-Year Meeting

Online Surveys